Fantastic series. Love the format, love the quality of analysis, and you guys are entertaining to listen to as well. Moaaaaaaar!
Jk3a and WiltOnTilt talk poker and try to analyze some new hand ranges of their opponents, while you try to figure out their holdings.
jk3a and WoT provide an in-depth analysis of 6max hand ranges at mid and high stakes. Learn how the two illest ballas(computer nerds) in the 816 break down the intricate details of their ranges and their opponents.
Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.
Fantastic series. Love the format, love the quality of analysis, and you guys are entertaining to listen to as well. Moaaaaaaar!
I like your line with QJ but wats your plan if he 3bets flop?
call and check is probably how i'm playing much of my range that is continuing here, except sometimes shipping strong hands and decent draws and folding the bad draws/semibluffs
whether i'm check/folding or chk/calling has to do with how i think my opponent perceives my range here. vs many it is a c/f but vs some i'm continuing.
Time Link to 00:14:42
Isn`t checking here in Villain`s shoes with TT/JJ on the turn actually good, on average?
I mean, as you said - this is not a turncard where we can expect Villain to continue bluffing -> so we cannot call too light (77,8x, doublefloats...)
So it seems that C/Calling to floatcatch (vs. low FDs, JT, QJ...) has in this spot some merits. What you think?
Isn`t checking here in Villain`s shoes with TT/JJ on the turn actually good, on average?
I mean, as you said - this is not a turncard where we can expect Villain to continue bluffing -> so we cannot call too light (77,8x, doublefloats...)
So it seems that C/Calling to floatcatch (vs. low FDs, JT, QJ...) has in this spot some merits. What you think?
it def has some merit, obv there's some leveling and you could use a different part of your range to c/c, etc..
Time Link to 00:34:51
Seems like a little thin to me (we need >50% vs. his callingrange to make a val.bet better than a CB):
Vs. something like this,
TT-88, 66-55, 22, AdTd, A7s, KdJd, KdTd, K7s, Q7s, JdTd, Jd9d, Jd8d, J7s, Jd6d, Td9d, Td8d, T7s, 97s, 87s, 74s+, A7o, K7o, Q7o, J7o, 97o, 87o,
we only have about 40% EQ.
-> with K7o we already would have 48,5% EQ and A7o would be with 57% EQ already a clear Val.bet
But anyways, all your both`s mentioned thoughts, ideas and views on this in general are very great imo^^
Time Link to 00:43:44
I don`t get why it is good for Villain to bet here for example KJ vs. our perceived range when checking the turn (sometimes tricky sets, air and rarely a worse TP...)?
I don`t get why it is good for Villain to bet here for example KJ vs. our perceived range when checking the turn (sometimes tricky sets, air and rarely a worse TP...)?
balance, a little value, and protection
balance, a little value, and protection
all right, thx.
I think, mixing it up seems like a good idea (exspecially when you have in such spots delayed floating in your overall gameplan)
Home → Poker Forums → Mid Stakes Shorthanded NL → Where the Buffalo Roam : Episode Six