Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by WiltOnTilt (Mid Stakes)

Where the Buffalo Roam: Episode Four

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Where the Buffalo Roam: Episode Four by WiltOnTilt, jk3a

Jk3a and WiltOnTilt are roaming with the buffalo as they review hands from 400NL and try to nail down ranges.

About Where the Buffalo Roam Subscribe to

jk3a and WoT provide an in-depth analysis of 6max hand ranges at mid and high stakes. Learn how the two illest ballas(computer nerds) in the 816 break down the intricate details of their ranges and their opponents.

Tags

wiltontilt jk3a where the buffalo roam hh review hand replayer 400nl 400 nl $2/4 ipod friendly

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 46 minutes long
  • Posted almost 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Where the Buffalo Roam: Episode Four

or track by Email or RSS


jjd323

Avatar for jjd323

585 posts
Joined 08/2008

Time Link to 00:27:47

I don't mind checking the turn as long as you are overbet jamming any river when it checks around.

Posted almost 3 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

898 posts
Joined 01/2008

I don't mind checking the turn as long as you are overbet jamming any river when it checks around.



why?

Posted almost 3 years ago

jjd323

Avatar for jjd323

585 posts
Joined 08/2008

why?



One reason to bet the turn was given that we might miss value from the fish; he isn't folding a 6 on the river if we jam so we don't miss any value there.

pianospike is probably never putting in more chips without a J anyway, and he will call an overbet jam with that anyway (although he will almost always bet it on the turn too). If we bet and pianospike calls or jams, the fish might get muslced out with two-pair; if pianospike bets a J the fish might call and we can trap more dead money with our nuts.

The only time we miss value is when pianospike and the fish have dogshit; that will be balanced by the times that we pick up spaz-value from bluffs by the fish, the fish calls us on the river with twopair or a set, or when a J or 6 comes on the river and he calls us to play the board.

Posted almost 3 years ago

Peesocake

Avatar for Peesocake

948 posts
Joined 02/2007

So I counted the value combos WoT could have, in that last hand:
QJ 6
KT 12
Q9 6
J9 9
Q6 6
J6 9
JJ 3
QQ 1
66 3
AQ 8
KK 3
AA 6

for a total of 72 combos!

He is getting around 2:1 on a call though, he needs to be good 30% of the time, so if he can find 22 bluffing combo's or more, he should be alright.
JT 12
AT 16
K9,T9 etc, and eventhough not all play the same way (bet the turn), there seem to be enough bluffs in there.

Posted almost 3 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

898 posts
Joined 01/2008

One reason to bet the turn was given that we might miss value from the fish; he isn't folding a 6 on the river if we jam so we don't miss any value there.

pianospike is probably never putting in more chips without a J anyway, and he will call an overbet jam with that anyway (although he will almost always bet it on the turn too). If we bet and pianospike calls or jams, the fish might get muslced out with two-pair; if pianospike bets a J the fish might call and we can trap more dead money with our nuts.

The only time we miss value is when pianospike and the fish have dogshit; that will be balanced by the times that we pick up spaz-value from bluffs by the fish, the fish calls us on the river with twopair or a set, or when a J or 6 comes on the river and he calls us to play the board.



when the turn checks around, neither villain has a jack but a super small % and I don't think there's any guarantee that 6x calls an overbet.

their combined ranges for checking the turn are very unlikely to call an overbet. that doesn't mean it might not be best depending on how often they call other sizes, but I doubt it's optimal

Posted almost 3 years ago

DiggerTheDog

Avatar for DiggerTheDog

696 posts
Joined 09/2008

Wilt - I think the term you were looking for was Devils Advocate.

Posted almost 3 years ago

jjd323

Avatar for jjd323

585 posts
Joined 08/2008

when the turn checks around, neither villain has a jack but a super small % and I don't think there's any guarantee that 6x calls an overbet.

their combined ranges for checking the turn are very unlikely to call an overbet. that doesn't mean it might not be best depending on how often they call other sizes, but I doubt it's optimal



So if you have a hand like AT and the turn checks around you are overbetting the river (as a bluff) close to 100%, given that they never call this bet size.

Posted almost 3 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

898 posts
Joined 01/2008

So if you have a hand like AT and the turn checks around you are overbetting the river (as a bluff) close to 100%, given that they never call this bet size.



100%

Posted almost 3 years ago

zenben

Avatar for zenben

1270 posts
Joined 03/2009

Time Link to 00:29:25

on the T98 7 board, you mention you check the turn because you would do this with the majority of your range. This would include sets, two pairs, and hands like AT, correct? You never mentioned how you continue in the hand with these hands after the PFR bets the turn and the fish folds. Sets are an easy ch/C (shove is not getting called by worse) but do we then ch/F the blank river? What do you do with a hand like 98s/T9s/T8s here? Do you expect UTG to check behind or vbet his QQ+? AT just ch/fold the turn, correct? If he checks behind the turn and the river is blank, what do we do with sets/2pairs/TPTK? ch/F? what about 6x?

Posted almost 3 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

898 posts
Joined 01/2008

on the T98 7 board, you mention you check the turn because you would do this with the majority of your range. This would include sets, two pairs, and hands like AT, correct? You never mentioned how you continue in the hand with these hands after the PFR bets the turn and the fish folds. Sets are an easy ch/C (shove is not getting called by worse) but do we then ch/F the blank river? What do you do with a hand like 98s/T9s/T8s here? Do you expect UTG to check behind or vbet his QQ+? AT just ch/fold the turn, correct? If he checks behind the turn and the river is blank, what do we do with sets/2pairs/TPTK? ch/F? what about 6x?



prob c/c sets, c/f everything else. turn bettor has mostly Jx

Posted almost 3 years ago

zenben

Avatar for zenben

1270 posts
Joined 03/2009

prob c/c sets, c/f everything else. turn bettor has mostly Jx



So ch/C turn, ch/F sets on blank river then, correct? And if turn checks around (so fish is still in pot on river) can we ever vbet a blank river with a set or 2 pair?

Posted almost 3 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

898 posts
Joined 01/2008

So ch/C turn, ch/F sets on blank river then, correct? And if turn checks around (so fish is still in pot on river) can we ever vbet a blank river with a set or 2 pair?



yes

maybe small

Posted almost 3 years ago

SpewKid

Avatar for SpewKid

578 posts
Joined 02/2008

So ch/C turn, ch/F sets on blank river then, correct? And if turn checks around (so fish is still in pot on river) can we ever vbet a blank river with a set or 2 pair?



Do we really get good enough odds to check/call the turn with a set knowing that villain always has a straight? It also seems hard to get paid if we fill up on the river.
Great video btw. Maybe Aaron can also include some hands where he owns people, not the other way round Smile

Posted almost 3 years ago

jk3a

Avatar for jk3a

898 posts
Joined 01/2008

Do we really get good enough odds to check/call the turn with a set knowing that villain always has a straight? It also seems hard to get paid if we fill up on the river.
Great video btw. Maybe Aaron can also include some hands where he owns people, not the other way round Smile



obv not c/c every turn bet size

Posted almost 3 years ago




HomePoker ForumsMid Stakes Shorthanded NL → Where the Buffalo Roam : Episode Four