5 *, liked to see more dept thinking and construct the range when the hand develop
WiltOnTilt and jk3a kick off their series with a few hands from each of them in the mid/high stakes 6 max games they've played in.
jk3a and WoT provide an in-depth analysis of 6max hand ranges at mid and high stakes. Learn how the two illest ballas(computer nerds) in the 816 break down the intricate details of their ranges and their opponents.
Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.
5 *, liked to see more dept thinking and construct the range when the hand develop
Love this series so far, mean really really love it.
Prefer to see you play more and continue the thought processes. Was great covering the card, first time I watched I was more focused on putting you and villians on hand ranges. Second time, I just soaked up your thought processes.
Just brilliant video!
Prefer to see more of this style as opposed to math discussions.
can we get this in ipod compatible??
+ 1 and all future episodes in this series too please!
Wilt - Final hand.
Do you like/ prefer villian betting turn and checking back river? Now that this hand has actually taken place.
If villian checked back the turn with two pair - can you explain why that is bad?
Yea i think his turn bet is really good. It's easy for opponents to call the turn with lots of hands just to see if he shuts down on the river or not. It's harder for people to bluff catch the river with non Jx.
As far as whether or not he should bet the river, it's good against me, not sure it's good vs others.
ALL - be sure to read all the posts in this thread prior to posting a question, especially as it relates to the QT hand.
Thanks for watching guys.
excellent episode.
please can you try and hide the cards better. I know you were trying to show the raise sizes but I can see the soots. Ta.
lol jared you such a cash game donkey, LRR is old hat for the tourney donks
new hat for jk3a ![]()
iphone version please ![]()
Excellent concept
Excellent stuff guys although gotta second what richbrown said, we could see you had two spades in the second hand and something offsuit in the third, but not a huge deal.
Regarding the math, here's an idea. You guys discussed the ranges you had for each action several times. What would be interesting to see is the actual percentage breakdown of each action in your overall range. eg in the first hand the breakdown of raise/call/fold on the flop would have been something like 0%/81%/19% I think. Introducing something like this for each street for both you and the villain would be a great visualization tool and could lead to some good discussion about exploitability.
Time Link to 00:08:30
Jared, I agree with you that I'll almost never 4bet AK here, and will more often that not flat instead of 4bet QQ here. However, with AA and KK I'm going to 4bet 100% of the time. When we 4bet here with AA/KK, he's stacking off close to 100% of the time with his entire 3betting range. However, he won't do this near as easily postflop since AK will often miss and his big pairs will occasionally flop an overcard, which all will kill our action. By doing this preflop, yeah our range isn't balanced, but how well is our specific opponent going to know this and exploit us?
Jared, I agree with you that I'll almost never 4bet AK here, and will more often that not flat instead of 4bet QQ here. However, with AA and KK I'm going to 4bet 100% of the time. When we 4bet here with AA/KK, he's stacking off close to 100% of the time with his entire 3betting range. However, he won't do this near as easily postflop since AK will often miss and his big pairs will occasionally flop an overcard, which all will kill our action. By doing this preflop, yeah our range isn't balanced, but how well is our specific opponent going to know this and exploit us?
if he's stacking off nearly 100%, I agree, I don't think that's the case though.
if he's stacking off nearly 100%, I agree, I don't think that's the case though.
So what do you think a villain against you in this spot will do with JJ/QQ or AK/AQ? Do you think they sometimes 3b/fold AK, or just 3b/call QQ/JJ? Maybe vice versa?
I guess in my experience, I almost never see a TAG/Nit/LAG with a 3betting range this tight in this type of a specific positional spot ever fold to my 4bet. They'll occasionally 3b/call, but almost never fold.
So what do you think a villain against you in this spot will do with JJ/QQ or AK/AQ? Do you think they sometimes 3b/fold AK, or just 3b/call QQ/JJ? Maybe vice versa?
I guess in my experience, I almost never see a TAG/Nit/LAG with a 3betting range this tight in this type of a specific positional spot ever fold to my 4bet. They'll occasionally 3b/call, but almost never fold.
combination of sample size not being very reliable(i.e. some 'bluffs' in his range) and the occasional 3bet/fold something for value
I'm pretty sure you just misspoke here since I think it's pretty clear with 1 card to come we have < 50% equity. 49% is our equity on the flop. After the turn, we have ~30% equity.
i was joking. thx for the fine tooth comb
Just fyi, you mentioned that sometimes in HEM it shows the equity % and sometimes it doesn't. The reason it didn't is because you had the 'Show Known Cards' unchecked. It should show the % for all shown hole cards in the hand.
Home → Poker Forums → Mid Stakes Shorthanded NL → Where the Buffalo Roam : Episode One