---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by jk3a (Mid Stakes)

Gooooood Serieeeeees!!!

jk3a, I like your HUD,can i try it ? Were can i get it?

there's a download link to it in one of the videos in the 4 part series where I played 4 stakes at once??? Can find it later if you don't

tough quiz, best answer and winner was Peesocake. His answer was almost identical to my thoughts in ep 7 on answer.

tough quiz, best answer and winner was Peesocake. His answer was almost identical to my thoughts in ep 7 on answer.

Hi Jk3a,

what is wrong on my answer? i had the same hands u said so J10+, 1010+ and fh with 55

Hi Jk3a,

what is wrong on my answer? i had the same hands u said so J10+, 1010+ and fh with 55

note that in my explanation I said "mostly good tens" and "occasionally overpairs", etc... I feel like there's a pretty big difference between that and your answer. You def were close though. Thanks for watching.

note that in my explanation I said "mostly good tens" and "occasionally overpairs", etc... I feel like there's a pretty big difference between that and your answer. You def were close though. Thanks for watching.

okay u said mostly good tens with that board every 10 had a fh and the overs i had in my answer 1010+ means 10,JJ,QQ,KK,AA

okay u said mostly good tens with that board every 10 had a fh and the overs i had in my answer 1010+ means 10,JJ,QQ,KK,AA

oops, i'm sorry, def ignored the Tx is a full house even when I made the ep 7. still feel the difference between "occasional overpairs" and TT+ is too significant to give you the nod

oops, i'm sorry, def ignored the Tx is a full house even when I made the ep 7. still feel the difference between "occasional overpairs" and TT+ is too significant to give you the nod

Can you explain what makes Tx so much more likely than overpairs here? Is it just the number of combos? The turn check? The bet sizing? I personally thought overpairs were the majority of a good thinking TAG's range here when facing another TAG/reg, so I just want to better understand what makes Tx the most likely hand we are facing.

Also, in your answer to this quiz in ep 7, you didn't mention the worst hand hero can profitably call with on the river. I would happily fold 88/99 here since the majority, if not all of his bluffs are betting the turn and we are basically never seeing 88 type hands value bet here since they can't get called by worse. I expect you to say Tx is a call due to the fact that we chop with all his Tx, but like I said above, I'd be much more surprised to see Tx check this turn than a hand like JJ+, and if we have a T, his Tx combos are MUCH more depleted...so maybe Tx is a fold??

Can you explain what makes Tx so much more likely than overpairs here? Is it just the number of combos? The turn check? The bet sizing? I personally thought overpairs were the majority of a good thinking TAG's range here when facing another TAG/reg, so I just want to better understand what makes Tx the most likely hand we are facing.

Also, in your answer to this quiz in ep 7, you didn't mention the worst hand hero can profitably call with on the river. I would happily fold 88/99 here since the majority, if not all of his bluffs are betting the turn and we are basically never seeing 88 type hands value bet here since they can't get called by worse. I expect you to say Tx is a call due to the fact that we chop with all his Tx, but like I said above, I'd be much more surprised to see Tx check this turn than a hand like JJ+, and if we have a T, his Tx combos are MUCH more depleted...so maybe Tx is a fold??

Tx being most likely in my opinion because I think alot of overpairs get bet on the turn or bet bigger on river

OMG missed one quiz

me 2, I even missed 2 (don´t even know how it happened) ...

Time Link to 00:45:05

A6 high on 852T5 I agree this is a call I actually think its a snap call.


Even if he is vbetting JTs + we are still have good equity.


Board: 8d 2h 5d Th 5c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 45.946% 40.54% 05.41% 15 2.00 { Ah6h }
Hand 1: 54.054% 48.65% 05.41% 18 2.00 { QdQh, QdQs, QhQs, JcJd, JdJh, JhJs, 8c8h, 55, AdQd, AdJd, AdTd, AhTh, Ad9d, Ad7d, Ad6d, Ad5d, Ah5h, Ad4d, Ad3d, KdQd, KhQh, KsQs, KcJc, KdJd, KhJh, KdTd, QdJd, QhJh, QdTd, QhTh, JdTd, JhTh, Jd9d, Jh9h, T8s, 9d7d, 9h7h, 76s, 6h5h, 5h4h }

A6 high on 852T5 I agree this is a call I actually think its a snap call.


Even if he is vbetting JTs + we are still have good equity.


Board: 8d 2h 5d Th 5c
Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 45.946% 40.54% 05.41% 15 2.00 { Ah6h }
Hand 1: 54.054% 48.65% 05.41% 18 2.00 { QdQh, QdQs, QhQs, JcJd, JdJh, JhJs, 8c8h, 55, AdQd, AdJd, AdTd, AhTh, Ad9d, Ad7d, Ad6d, Ad5d, Ah5h, Ad4d, Ad3d, KdQd, KhQh, KsQs, KcJc, KdJd, KhJh, KdTd, QdJd, QhJh, QdTd, QhTh, JdTd, JhTh, Jd9d, Jh9h, T8s, 9d7d, 9h7h, 76s, 6h5h, 5h4h }

yea, that one kinda haunted me, shoulda called

there's a download link to it in one of the videos in the 4 part series where I played 4 stakes at once??? Can find it later if you don't

Jk3a Found it! 1 question,if u got time i did replaced your .xml file with the prefs one,all good. I just tried your HUD, but the reason i wanted it,is because u got 3B,CB etc etc before the actual stats. I dont have them also it still only shows my previous stats, isnt this gonna change after i use yours? hmmm dunno,hope u can help me out
Thx

Jk3a Found it! 1 question,if u got time i did replaced your .xml file with the prefs one,all good. I just tried your HUD, but the reason i wanted it,is because u got 3B,CB etc etc before the actual stats. I dont have them also it still only shows my previous stats, isnt this gonna change after i use yours? hmmm dunno,hope u can help me out
Thx

Nvm i did something wrong my bad,got your HUD now sweeeet

Time Link to 00:30:11

When you decide to bet smaller. would be 1/3-PS-Bet an option in order to also have the additional value that he might be spazzing out?

Time Link to 00:43:39

Wouldn`t you also bluff here any diamond on the river?
I mean,
So many FD-combos he should not have in his Coldcallingrange pre comparison with his weak Madehand-combos here.