Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by BalugaWhale (Mid Stakes)

Coaching Kristy: Episode Eight

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Coaching Kristy: Episode Eight by BalugaWhale

BalugaWhale and Kristy wrap up their series with a review of her play at 2 tables of 200NL.

About Coaching Kristy Subscribe to

Pokernews' crack reporting ace Kristy Arnett powers up with poker training from our friends at DeucesCracked! Watch as Kristy works through BalugaWhale's coaching program, learning how to crush online No Limit cash games in the process.

Tags

balugawhale coaching kristy kristy arnett 200nl 200 nl 2-tabling

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 72 minutes long
  • Posted almost 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Coaching Kristy: Episode Eight

or track by Email or RSS


HWilly1

Avatar for HWilly1

1 posts
Joined 07/2011

A solid SB PP flatting range would be 77-TT or JJ. It's very difficult to extract value from 22-66 by flatting because they have so little SDV; however, if you are going to flat them you will need to occasionally play back (c/r etc) to supplement the slightly -EV pre-flop flat. When the board comes J54r we will have at least 50% equity vs his V!'s range. Assuming that V! will be c-betting this board nearly 100% of the time we essentially have 4 options. c/f (neutral EV). c/c (difficult because our SDV is very weak and we are against a competent, aggressive V! that won't hesitate to 2-barrel). Donk bet (we can attempt to actualize our equity and avoid playing another street). c/r (seems best). Our bet accomplishes multiple things. 1. We force V! to basically turn his hand face-up. 2. We only need 68% FE to make an outright profit. 3. We avoid a difficult and most likely -EV c/c'ing situation. 4. We actualize our equity (V! can't call wt ace high)
^^We are using our pair to prevent ace high from winning at showdown.

Posted over 1 year ago

Sillygoose87

Avatar for Sillygoose87

85 posts
Joined 08/2011

Time Link to 00:22:49

Methinks the problem with this line of thinking is (1) we are assuming that we have good enough implied odds to profitably mine with such a bad hand and (2) we define our range as not a great hand by limping. This is markedly different from playing a medium strength hand post flop because we flat with a completely undefined range post flop in position. When we start to limp our range is markedly defined.

As NL players our eyes are often wider than our mouths in terms of implied odds. We drastically over estimate how much of our opponent's stack we will get when we hit and drastically underestimate how often we'll get coolered when we're certain we're good

Posted over 1 year ago

BalugaWhale

Avatar for BalugaWhale

997 posts
Joined 01/2008

Methinks the problem with this line of thinking is (1) we are assuming that we have good enough implied odds to profitably mine with such a bad hand and (2) we define our range as not a great hand by limping. This is markedly different from playing a medium strength hand post flop because we flat with a completely undefined range post flop in position. When we start to limp our range is markedly defined.

As NL players our eyes are often wider than our mouths in terms of implied odds. We drastically over estimate how much of our opponent's stack we will get when we hit and drastically underestimate how often we'll get coolered when we're certain we're good



methinks youre underestimating our ability to play poker relative to our opponents

Posted over 1 year ago

Sillygoose87

Avatar for Sillygoose87

85 posts
Joined 08/2011

methinks youre underestimating our ability to play poker relative to our opponents



Methinks that may be the case. Dunning-Kruger effect is a doozy... That being said, I misread the amount villain had behind when I posted, especially in terms of BBs. I had a brain fart and thought we weren't playing 1/2.

Posted over 1 year ago

BalugaWhale

Avatar for BalugaWhale

997 posts
Joined 01/2008

Methinks that may be the case. Dunning-Kruger effect is a doozy... That being said, I misread the amount villain had behind when I posted, especially in terms of BBs. I had a brain fart and thought we weren't playing 1/2.


no worries! welcome to the forums Smile

Andrew

Posted over 1 year ago

Sillygoose87

Avatar for Sillygoose87

85 posts
Joined 08/2011

no worries! welcome to the forums Smile

Andrew



Thanks, Mr. Seidman. I'm a huge fan of this series (and your thought processes) and it's taken my game to a different level. I look forward to diving into your other works.

Posted over 1 year ago

DBG76

Avatar for DBG76

25 posts
Joined 05/2012

Hi, Firstly Ive love this series, Just watched them back to back the last few days and its really cemented a few things in my own mind for me and ive learnt a great deal.

1 question, about the discussion regarding our strategy against swipesvilles 3b strategy.

So, we know he is polarized OOP, this will be Big cards and all PPs? why do we want to then 4b lighter when he will more prone to 5b shove (say anypair + AQ+).

Did you mean 4b lighter for value and include all PPs 77+ so we can all the 5b for example? as opposed to 4b bluffing lighter? (and then folding).

Posted 12 months ago

DBG76

Avatar for DBG76

25 posts
Joined 05/2012

^^^^^^^^

Edit: I meant, so we know that he is 3betting 'Depolarized' OOP

Posted 12 months ago

axfjmk97531

Avatar for axfjmk97531

12 posts
Joined 09/2009

Time Link to 01:07:24

ok but who would be loosing money then if everyone watched that and crushed stakes in 6 weeks? Grin

Posted 6 months ago

OranRai

Avatar for OranRai

59 posts
Joined 02/2010

Time Link to 00:01:58

Peter Principle : Employees (players) tend to rise to their level of incompetence.

Posted 6 months ago




HomePoker ForumsMid Stakes Shorthanded NL → Coaching Kristy : Episode Eight