Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by whitelime (Mid Stakes)

LIME-AID Part Deux: Episode Seven

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

LIME-AID Part Deux: Episode Seven by whitelime

Whitelime continues with his 2-tabling journey. Listen as he describes his reads and philosophies as he plays $5/10 deep stack NLHE. Drink the knowledge, obey the thirst!!!

About LIME-AID Part Deux Subscribe to

2/4 - 5/10 NL 6-max strategy with the return of whitelime. Drink the LIME-AID.

Tags

whitelime lime-aid deep stack 2-tabling $5/10

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 52 minutes long
  • Posted over 4 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for LIME-AID Part Deux: Episode Seven

or track by Email or RSS


Bruut99

Avatar for Bruut99

18 posts
Joined 06/2008

I am so happy that i joined this site.. Love to see MANY video's of whitelime and KRANTZ. Cardrunners became a big joke. Releasing maybe 1 or 2 good video's (Containing something you can learn when you play nl200 and higher) a month.

Posted over 4 years ago

phenom

Avatar for phenom

64 posts
Joined 08/2008

Wouldn't a smaller river check raise w the 77 be more believable?

Posted over 4 years ago

Jsturm

Avatar for Jsturm

174 posts
Joined 09/2008

Hello White Lime great vid I have a question about the hand you played at 31:35. When you float with AQ on the 897 board and then hit an A on the turn, you say you expect him to call because of your crazy image. If he's unable to fold to an A turn do you think he will really fold to any other cards besides perhaps a 10? Also it seems there might be some reverse implied odds considering his range is pretty strong in that spot, if you hit a Q on the turn theres a decent chance its not good. Obviously it worked out well for you but in a vacuum do you think that is a good spot to float, if so why?

Posted over 4 years ago

whitelime

Avatar for whitelime

518 posts
Joined 01/2008

Agreed, big bet to win 100 bucks?



People are dumb and will call smaller raises not understanding two pair is a bluff catcher. They'll fold one pair Ax and call w/ two pair which makes no sense. So I'll put them to the test for their whole stack...

Posted over 4 years ago

whitelime

Avatar for whitelime

518 posts
Joined 01/2008

Hello White Lime great vid I have a question about the hand you played at 31:35. When you float with AQ on the 897 board and then hit an A on the turn, you say you expect him to call because of your crazy image. If he's unable to fold to an A turn do you think he will really fold to any other cards besides perhaps a 10? Also it seems there might be some reverse implied odds considering his range is pretty strong in that spot, if you hit a Q on the turn theres a decent chance its not good. Obviously it worked out well for you but in a vacuum do you think that is a good spot to float, if so why?



They are different cards. The T connects hard w/ the range of hands i call the flop with whereas the A doesn't.

Posted over 4 years ago

Jsturm

Avatar for Jsturm

174 posts
Joined 09/2008

They are different cards. The T connects hard w/ the range of hands i call the flop with whereas the A doesn't.



True which is why I said i expected him to fold to a 10/J turn. What was your plan for if the turn was a queen? and would you have tried to steal if the turn was a 6?

Posted over 4 years ago

pokerisokay

Avatar for pokerisokay

5 posts
Joined 01/2008

People are dumb and will call smaller raises not understanding two pair is a bluff catcher. They'll fold one pair Ax and call w/ two pair which makes no sense. So I'll put them to the test for their whole stack...




I agree this bet WILL accomplish making the guy fold a whoooole lot, but how often does he need to fold to this in order for it to be +EV? I'm too lazy to do the exact, exact math but shoving $2102 to win $117, doesn't this require him folding I don't know, 95% of the time or something? I mean even if the guy hasn't even looked at his cards yet and has a random 2 cards, he will have better than 2nd set (JJJ) here a staggering 5.152% of the time. So you are hoping that he NEVER hero calls top set or a non-nut straight here, EVER, in order for this raise to BREAK EVEN.

I mean it's hard to put this guy on a set or straight too obviously, but it's also going to be pretty hard for him to put YOU on a nut hand here I'd think, which should increase his frequency of hero calling. And I mean if he hero calls even a TEENY TINY amount here, and I'm talking about hero calls with like a set or two pair, you're losing money. If this guy ever assumes your range is super polarized to nuts or air and starts making hero calls with like aces up here, you are totally screwed.

So I mean I do think this is going to make him fold non-nut hands a huge percentage of the time, but like 100%? Cause even if he hero calls like 5% of the time and has huge hands some other percentage you're already losing money and man, this play just seems weird.

Also I mean is raising to $800 or $1000 going to make much difference? Is this guy going to suddenly call way looser than for $2100? Or make some sick minraise bluffshove with a hand he would have folded for the full $2100?

Anyway one nice thing is after this video, Whitelime is going to get paid with the nuts a lot more on rivers like this where people remember this wacky, wacky hand

Posted over 4 years ago

goldseraph

Avatar for goldseraph

1339 posts
Joined 03/2008

Enjoying this series Emil, not going to go into a bunch of specific hands but overall I am def getting a feel for how to play more loose aggressive. Keep the live play videos coming, but maybe take it a step farther with explanation of your image, I find that about 10 times per video you bring up your image, your maniacal image etc, maybe extend that to 'I have x image, so opponent is putting me on this range of hands rather than these hands he might put a standard TAG on' etc. That is my only minor suggestion but this series is prob my 2nd favorite atm to Coaching Tree.Smile

Posted over 4 years ago

shark_fishin

Avatar for shark_fishin

265 posts
Joined 03/2008

nice video, but that check-shove with 77 kinda confused me... you risk so much to win so little.. :-\

Posted over 4 years ago

shark_fishin

Avatar for shark_fishin

265 posts
Joined 03/2008

oh i have a question, in the hand 40mins in where you have 75 on K63ss 4 J and you overbet the river for $750 in a $477 pot. i wondered how you chose your overbet size, im kind of experimenting with overbetting, but i think i make it too big sometimes.

anyway, loving this series Smile

Posted over 4 years ago

Eagle314

Avatar for Eagle314

5 posts
Joined 05/2008

i let DC down with my terrible play Frown
get u next time emil!!!!!

Posted over 4 years ago




HomePoker ForumsMid Stakes Shorthanded NL → LIME-AID Part Deux : Episode Seven