Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by FoxwoodsFiend (Mid Stakes)

Dear FoxwoodsFiend: Episode Nine

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

Dear FoxwoodsFiend: Episode Nine by FoxwoodsFiend

FoxwoodsFiend continues his epic series of Dear FoxwoodsFiend. He breaks down some good hand history spots submitted by you viewers, but we need many more hand histories.

About Dear FoxwoodsFiend Subscribe to

Dear FoxwoodsFiend, how do I play this hand? Ariel plays Sherlock in this interactive member hand history review series at mid and high stakes No Limit. Each episode concludes with a review of one of FWF’s own hands. Keep an eye out for some hands from our Executive Producers, as well!

Tags

foxwoodsfiend dear foxwoodsfiend hh review hand replayer ipod friendly

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: Mid Stakes
  • 51 minutes long
  • Posted almost 4 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for Dear FoxwoodsFiend: Episode Nine

or track by Email or RSS


Speedlimits

Avatar for Speedlimits

30 posts
Joined 04/2008

spino1i

Avatar for spino1i

184 posts
Joined 09/2008

Time Link to 00:00:45

OK so it sounds like I misplayed this hand. Do you like this turn checkback line shove river as a stone-cold bluff?

The idea behind it is this: It allows me to know whether or not his hand is willing to stack off, because if he is he'd shove into me on the river. Thus when he checks again im confident he wont stack off if *I* shove.

So yeh, I maybe this should be used as a bluff?

Posted almost 4 years ago

FoxwoodsFiend

Avatar for FoxwoodsFiend

345 posts
Joined 10/2007

Where do we send hand histories too?



foxwoodsfiend@gmail.com

or PM me

Posted almost 4 years ago

spino1i

Avatar for spino1i

184 posts
Joined 09/2008

Time Link to 00:19:57

I think the main problem with betting the flop here is the fact most pocket pairs wont call, theyll shove. Well at least they *should*. This forces you to fold your equity share of the pot (which is 25%(!)) In reality at 1/2 NL most dont shove this flop with a pocket pair as often (they just call), so betting cant be quite as bad, and is perhaps the best play. At much higher stakes I thinking checking is almost certainly the best play.

Posted almost 4 years ago

FoxwoodsFiend

Avatar for FoxwoodsFiend

345 posts
Joined 10/2007

OK so it sounds like I misplayed this hand. Do you like this turn checkback line shove river as a stone-cold bluff?



yeah, i kind of do like it as a bluff, but i'm kind of crazy also

Posted almost 4 years ago

danndann1

Avatar for danndann1

298 posts
Joined 05/2008

Time Link to 00:34:39

ok, so you think this play (bet/folding w second pair) applies only in deep stack 4bet pots or also in 100bb games but w/ 3bet pots?

Posted almost 4 years ago

FoxwoodsFiend

Avatar for FoxwoodsFiend

345 posts
Joined 10/2007

ok, so you think this play (bet/folding w second pair) applies only in deep stack 4bet pots or also in 100bb games but w/ 3bet pots?



not in 100bb 3bet pots, that'd be pretty bad

Posted almost 4 years ago

delcrossb

Avatar for delcrossb

4237 posts
Joined 04/2009

FWF you make me wish I played hold'em so you could articulate what I am doing wrong.

Posted almost 4 years ago

RainFall

Avatar for RainFall

103 posts
Joined 06/2008

The QQ hand i see villains spazz out ALL the time in 3 bet pots OOP when i check behind QQ/JJ on the flop. Do you think this is a different situation because the range is more defined in the 4 bet pots?

Posted almost 4 years ago

buddy_lee

Avatar for buddy_lee

2 posts
Joined 07/2008

Hand 1 with the AKo...What do you think about checking back the turn then making a small river bet? Against a thinking player he might think you checked back the turn for control with a weak to moderate ace. So in turn maybe bluff shove to rep the king with his weak ace type hands.

Also when you bet the flop with QQ in the four bet pot why do u assume u won't get bluffed here? Most times people five bet get in KK AA and AK hoping to get the money in preflop. So if he raises the flop wouldn't his range be more weighted to flush draws and bluffs? That is assuming of course he isn't c/r getting in KQs KJs type hands.

Posted almost 4 years ago

Shake

Avatar for Shake

1 posts
Joined 10/2008

Around roughly six minutes, you say 'a king would check back the turn' but you actually meant 'checks back the flop', I think.

Good video, hope to see more high stakes six max or HU NL videos from you!

Posted almost 4 years ago

FoxwoodsFiend

Avatar for FoxwoodsFiend

345 posts
Joined 10/2007

The QQ hand i see villains spazz out ALL the time in 3 bet pots OOP when i check behind QQ/JJ on the flop. Do you think this is a different situation because the range is more defined in the 4 bet pots?



yeah, i think opponent's range is narrower in a 4bet pot than a 3bet pot so it's harder for him to spazz out as opposed to having a better hand than ours.

Posted almost 4 years ago

FoxwoodsFiend

Avatar for FoxwoodsFiend

345 posts
Joined 10/2007

Hand 1 with the AKo...What do you think about checking back the turn then making a small river bet? Against a thinking player he might think you checked back the turn for control with a weak to moderate ace. So in turn maybe bluff shove to rep the king with his weak ace type hands.

Also when you bet the flop with QQ in the four bet pot why do u assume u won't get bluffed here? Most times people five bet get in KK AA and AK hoping to get the money in preflop. So if he raises the flop wouldn't his range be more weighted to flush draws and bluffs? That is assuming of course he isn't c/r getting in KQs KJs type hands.



i don't think you ever induce a bluff w/the AK unless he has JQ/TJ (which he almost never does)

i think you have a point w/the QQ hand, but i think that since your equity against a flush draw as compared to against Kx hand isn't that great, the times the opponent does have AK (which sometimes doesn't 5bet cuz some people are nitty) or KQ and figures he'll take it down on a drawy board and not have to make any more decisions (people hate check/calling in big pots) really makes a bet/call pretty ugly. i could be convinced i'm wrong on this though

Posted almost 4 years ago

FoxwoodsFiend

Avatar for FoxwoodsFiend

345 posts
Joined 10/2007

Around roughly six minutes, you say 'a king would check back the turn' but you actually meant 'checks back the flop', I think.

Good video, hope to see more high stakes six max or HU NL videos from you!



I assume you're right and I misspoke, don't know the quote in question.

Stay tuned, I think my next vid is going to be my best one yet (I've already got the footage recorded, just have to talk over it)

Posted almost 4 years ago




HomePoker ForumsMid Stakes Shorthanded NL → Dear FoxwoodsFiend : Episode Nine