Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Ansky (High Stakes)

2 Months, 2 Million: Ansky: Episode Three

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

2 Months, 2 Million: Ansky: Episode Three by Ansky

Ansky plays six tables of high stakes NL and provides commentary on his play throughout. Stakes ranging from 5/10 to 40/80 provide a lot of NL action this episode.

About 2 Months, 2 Million Subscribe to

Two months. Two million. No problem. That's Team Israel's goal for the summer in Vegas. Watch Jay help hit it. This ongoing series is an in-depth look at his life during the shooting of whitelime, flawless_victory, Ansky and KRANTZ's forthcoming reality TV show (filming in Vegas this summer and airing on G4 in late August). Jay will play and analyze hands he's actually playing while on television, using an aggressive bankroll management strategy to climb from 5/10 and 10/20 back to the nosebleeds. Can he make it? We have faith. They don't call him pr1nnyraid for nothin'.

Tags

dani stern ansky two months two million 2M2MM high stakes 40/80 nl 5/10 nl 10/20 nl 25/50 nl six tabling 1000nl 2000nl 5000nl

Video Details

  • Game: nlhe
  • Stakes: High Stakes
  • 45 minutes long
  • Posted over 3 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for 2 Months, 2 Million: Ansky: Episode Three

or track by Email or RSS


benny1978

Avatar for benny1978

32 posts
Joined 08/2009

Hi Dany,

I often get critasised for calling to much in 3 bet pots OOP. I realise its wrong to do it with small pairs as you have poor equity etc.
But what about the hands like KQs+, 88- JJ. Is it best to call and take a flop OOP with these hands rather than 4bet folding?
I know if were happy to get it in then come over the top and hopefully be good.
But then were turning decent hands into bluffs if we are folding to a 5bet.
Can you explain whats best to do in these typical situations as if a nit 3 bets you and an aggro reg does it.....does this differ in your decision making?

Sry if that was ramberling and makes no sense!

P.S - Great to see you making vids for dueces cracked. Legendry skills.

Posted over 3 years ago

halvadron

Avatar for halvadron

255 posts
Joined 06/2009

just posting positive feedback. good vid

Posted over 3 years ago

Ansky

Avatar for Ansky

470 posts
Joined 08/2009

Hi Dany,

I often get critasised for calling to much in 3 bet pots OOP. I realise its wrong to do it with small pairs as you have poor equity etc.
But what about the hands like KQs+, 88- JJ. Is it best to call and take a flop OOP with these hands rather than 4bet folding?
I know if were happy to get it in then come over the top and hopefully be good.
But then were turning decent hands into bluffs if we are folding to a 5bet.
Can you explain whats best to do in these typical situations as if a nit 3 bets you and an aggro reg does it.....does this differ in your decision making?

Sry if that was ramberling and makes no sense!

P.S - Great to see you making vids for dueces cracked. Legendry skills.



I'd never value-4b and fold to a 5b... so if i had hands i wasnt sure what id want to do vs a 5b i'd likely just flat with them.

Posted over 3 years ago

AlCapown3d

Avatar for AlCapown3d

211 posts
Joined 11/2008

I'd never value-4b and fold to a 5b...


Against some players that 3bet with a high frequency, call 4bets with a high frequency and 5bet with a low frequency value 4bet/folding hands like JJ,TT,AQ can actually make sense even though it feels really dumb to do so.

A bonus is when such a hand goes to showdown, they think you 4bet/call with a wider value range than you´d actually do and therefore won´t 5bet bluff you anyway.

Posted over 3 years ago

consuellas_revenge

Avatar for consuellas_revenge

48 posts
Joined 06/2008

Sweet baby Jesus these games play aggressive preflop!
Ok, continuing....

I like it a lot so far, btw.

Posted over 3 years ago

consuellas_revenge

Avatar for consuellas_revenge

48 posts
Joined 06/2008

Time Link to 00:15:46

Great point about patting yourself on the back in that spot, which I usually do. I am so eager to justify my actions that I never stopped to think the information gained in that spot could be telling me (and probably is) that I had it all backwards.

Posted over 3 years ago

Eagle314

Avatar for Eagle314

5 posts
Joined 05/2008

TheChosenOne

Avatar for TheChosenOne

93 posts
Joined 04/2008

Time Link to 00:15:53

Interesting thoughts on determining whether you would be correct in calling based on the hand he showed down.

Do you think you were necessarily wrong here based on the fact that he didn't bluff? It could be that villain is still bluffing at a high enough frequency with the exact same holding but that he bases his action on his mood. I mean he thought about it, I think it could have gone either way.

Posted over 3 years ago

Ansky

Avatar for Ansky

470 posts
Joined 08/2009

Interesting thoughts on determining whether you would be correct in calling based on the hand he showed down.

Do you think you were necessarily wrong here based on the fact that he didn't bluff? It could be that villain is still bluffing at a high enough frequency with the exact same holding but that he bases his action on his mood. I mean he thought about it, I think it could have gone either way.



I agree, I wasn't saying I thought it should be thought about one way or the other, just that I was contemplating both sides of the coin. Like I said though, I tend to think that if you think your opponent is going to be bluffing river enough with his air hands, and he checks an air hand, you typically were making a mistake.

Posted over 3 years ago

Bruut99

Avatar for Bruut99

18 posts
Joined 06/2008

Dead-Inside

Avatar for Dead-Inside

59 posts
Joined 05/2008

I agree, I wasn't saying I thought it should be thought about one way or the other, just that I was contemplating both sides of the coin. Like I said though, I tend to think that if you think your opponent is going to be bluffing river enough with his air hands, and he checks an air hand, you typically were making a mistake.



I laughed when I heard you talk about that because that's exactly what I say to myself. "Yeah, uh... yeah I'm gonna call him if he bets I think. Hope he doesn't though", and then he checks air. And I'm like "... well at least I didn't make a bad call this time."

Posted over 3 years ago

seek42

Avatar for seek42

3 posts
Joined 03/2007

Time Link to 00:41:06

i think theres a pretty strong argument for him check-calling twice with a flush draw and then bluffing on the river when he misses. or making some kind of weird block bet with 9x cc or something. i dont think he would play a set this way just because if was trapping flop and turn he would surely trap the river. since nothing makes sense id click call. the worst that happens is u get info on how he plays Tx or something.

Posted over 3 years ago

ploloser237

Avatar for ploloser237

2 posts
Joined 12/2009

Time Link to 00:04:46

I wasnt real sure why u would be so unsure to 4 bet ak off against someone u know to be a lag regular?

Posted over 3 years ago

jjiggster

Avatar for jjiggster

8 posts
Joined 01/2010

Time Link to 00:37:22

Hi Dani,

Big fan of your vids since the pokersavvy days. Just wanted to comment on the J7 suited hand that you played from the small blind. Can a argument be made for betting on the turn? It's true that he can't strictly put you on what you have based on your action on the flop, but once you check the turn you essentially turn your hand face up and give him a good chance to barrel you on the turn and river on most scare cards.

Posted over 3 years ago

NateGZ

Avatar for NateGZ

6 posts
Joined 07/2012




HomePoker ForumsHigh Stakes Strategy → 2 Months, 2 Million : Ansky: Episode Three