---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by KRANTZ (High Stakes)

out of interest why would you CR here?

Look at his stack.

HU video would be great!

You re calling 4k to win 18k that 68s so getting 4.5 to 1 with 22% equity even vs the nuts, its a snap call imo considering his range includes draws.

Look at his stack.

And also the BTN here is betting most of his range just trying to take down the pot. By cR you actually put him in a tough situation. If you just check call (if BB folded) there is a lot of cards that can come on turn that Jay will have problem with.

Time Link to 00:52:29

When you 3b kings right after you 3b 68s, why do you check that flop?

They're gonna assume you're wide and with your air you'd cbet there right? By checking you turn your hand face up as showdown value and you won't reall induce turn bluffs. By betting you can induce a c/r or maybe a light c/c.

Also, dual commentary video with Ansky (or any other player combo) like he did with Aejones would be the nuts.

Time Link to 00:38:36

Jay can you help me understand something here with KT? You can expect to have 8 outs on turn here (5:1). Since you have to call 1250 you should get 6250 in the end. Pot is little over 3300 with 3671 behind. 6250 minus 3300 is close to 3000. So this should be a good call.

Question: you are summing the numbers 650 + 800 (pot) = 1400, than you mummble 1200 (i guess the price to call). You don't mention 1900 here. How exactly did you get your answer here - is there any shortcut to calculate this (since there is limited time during the game).

Thank you for your answer

In the 86s hand I actually anticipated villain check/shipping before he did. My reasoning was that I myself would check/ship there vs a good regular and the maniacal SB with a pretty wide range, just to isolate myself vs SB and go to showdown HU with him with lots of dead money in the pot. So I thought "if that guy ships it in, Krantz is gonna snapcall, because he obviously knows that" I was really surprised that you doubted your decision. OK, a point could be made that villain also knows that you won't cbet air here vs the SB but he should suspect you to pretty much felt any TP, prolly 2nd pair, 99+ (board was 678 tt if memory serves me right) and draws against the poor player, given what we had seen from him. The question now becomes: From how many hands of your stack-off-vs-SB-range can he get you off of?

I might be missing something super obvious here but to me that was a snapcall not because "lol I have 2pair in a 3bet pot" (a line of thinking which I hate btw) but for the reasons I outlined above.

A few questions:
In the KT hand on JxxQ is there any merit to checking back the turn instead?

When you check back KK on Axx and bet the A turn what would you do if he raised ?

Also curios to know about that 68 hand what ur buddies thought.

Cheers.

with the KT, would you bluff the river if he checked to you on a spade? on a blank?

In the 86hh hand, we're calling 1128 for the main pot and 3019 for the side pot, and looks like main pot is about 6800 before we act. Here are my rough ranges:

Fish: JJ-66,AcQc,AcJc,AcTc,A9s-A7s,Ac6c,Ac5c,Ac4c,Ac3c,Ac2c,KcQc,KcJc,KcTc,Kc9c,K8s-K7s,Kc3c,Kc2c,QcJc,QcTc,Qc9c,Q8s-Q7s,JcTc,J9s,T9s,98s,87s,76s,54s,A9o-A7o
Deldar: 99-66,AcQc,AcJc,AcTc,Ac9c,Ac8c,Ac7c,Ac6c,Ac5c,Ac4c,Ac3c,Ac2c,Kc9c,Kc8c,T9s,98s,87s,76s

Sorry for the pokerstove formatting. Basically, I figure a good guess is that Deldar would shove his nut FDs and his pair + FDs, but not other FDs. That's prob not exactly right but I think it's a decent approximation to the number of FDs he actually shoves and our equity against them.

Anyway, that gives us 30% equity in the main pot and 42% equity in the side pot. So if there were no side pot, equity from calling would be .30*(1128+6800)-1128 = 1250. And from side pot, .42*(2*3019)-3019 = -483. So you end up making $767 with my ranges.

So basically, it's ridic close. If we give deldar a couple less FDs or a little less 89/99, then it's a fold. Obv if we throw in overpairs it becomes a call again. So, it really depends on his very specific tendencies for shoving vs. calling here.

Great vid, would love to see a hu vid next week or two weeks

Nice video krantz, they are always great.

Ramblings = why your videos are the best

Diet soda has aspartame in it which is worse than drinking regular

HU for the next vid plz Krantz

Great vid btw

Great video, thanks!

Diet soda has aspartame in it which is worse than drinking regular

Way worse than regular in fact I don't think poison is too much of an overstatement

oh yeah fr please sir