---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by Ansky (High Stakes)

Well you are definitely wrong, and if you'd like I'll play a .5/1 reg and promise to 4b really big, donk hands with no equity sometimes, and occasionally represent no hand when bluffing.

hahaha owned

hahaha owned

Was not trying to insult him or anything. I think that 2/4 regs of today would beat 25/50 nl from like 4 years ago, but not .5/1 regs vs me and durrr 2 years ago...

Good video, I really enjoyed it. Looking forward to the rest.

Was not trying to insult him or anything. I think that 2/4 regs of today would beat 25/50 nl from like 4 years ago, but not .5/1 regs vs me and durrr 2 years ago...

Man . I don't think you share my sense of humour Great vids anyway!

Man . I don't think you share my sense of humour Great vids anyway!

Lol... Did you really think the way you wrote it would make it come off as if you were simply poking fun? Also, in my opinion, this is a great concept for a video series.

this is fantastic and well narrated!

thanks dani

Lol... Did you really think the way you wrote it would make it come off as if you were simply poking fun? Also, in my opinion, this is a great concept for a video series.

Yes I did. Anyone who really thinks that some nl100 regs are better than Ansky or durrr are.. well.. I thought this was so obvious that I find it ridicúlous to try to explain. Maybe it wasn't obvious then, my bad.

Please also note "way way better". That should make the sentence clearly sarcastic if nothing else does.

Was not trying to insult him or anything. I think that 2/4 regs of today would beat 25/50 nl from like 4 years ago, but not .5/1 regs vs me and durrr 2 years ago...

Communication break down , its always the same!!!
i've been listening to too much led zepplin today

Time Link to 00:35:24

Hi, I m new here and this is my first video. I am a highstakes heads up regular. Not sure if this is the place to discus hands, but here are my thoughts.
I dont like both of your lines! The instructor already said why he dislikes his own line, but he forgets to analize Toms play here.
I dont understand why he is calling these big bets with his flushdraw, he doesnt have any showdown value or the right pot odds, so he has to fold or produce some fold equity by raising or betting...his line just doesnt make sense to me!?!?

Time Link to 00:32:19

Ansky,

With A8 on AQ3r-2-K when durrrr raises your river lead. You say it's pretty much impossible for him to get to the river without showdown value, therefore he must be value raising. You enumerated all the hands in your range for leading turn then leading river ... stuff like 45, JT, A3/A2, 33 ... my question is, don't you think his actual value raising range is extremely narrow? He probably bets JT on flop 3/4 of the time at least? His raising range seems to be just like K3/KQ. Don't you think a 3b bluff would be a pretty sweet from your spot given all this?

Time Link to 00:35:20

Balance does not mean being able to have every hand in your range with every action. It does not mean that you have to have a bluff in every spot or a middle value range in every spot.

Ansky: What's your definition of balance?

this is so terrrrrible. how can you all say that its awesome? with that kind of plays ansky wouldnt beat today`s midstakes. I dont even think that I should back up what I am saying. I mean,it should seem so obvious to any good player that this is baaaaaaaaaaaad. 08 poker rox lol

trolls gonna troll

Do you think its good? I mean, this video is just bad play all the way with super standard analysis(its ok but really nothing useful for someone who plays hu)

Its useful to me.