Home → Poker Forums → High Stakes Strategy → set 3-way 3b pot deep
set 3-way 3b pot deep
11 posts, 9 voices
http://www.pokerhand.org/?4271770
first time ive played with leonidas but im almost sure he is a 10/20 reg playing multiple sites. he hadnt 3bet me yet (60 hands in) so his 3b range seemed to be reasonably tight. the key element in this hand is that wuffi is a total maniac with a flop bet of close to 100%. he cbets 100% and he leads out into the pfr 100% and he bets 100% when checked to and continues on every turn and most rivers. so it makes sense for leonidas to slow play a big hand here, but he might also obv check-call AA/AK/AQ. what do we do on the river? we have 2500$ left.
|
|
|---|
Research & Development! |
General Discussion |
Software and Tools |
Articles |
Podcasts |
|
|
|---|
WSOP Vegas 2010 |
|
|
|---|
Secret HQ |
Coaching |
Member Videos |
|
|
|---|
Videos |
|
|
|---|
High Stakes Strategy |
|
|
|---|
Micro Stakes Online NL |
Small Stakes Shorthanded NL |
Mid Stakes Shorthanded NL |
Heads Up NL |
Full Ring No Limit |
|
|
|---|
Beginner Limit Hold'em |
Mid/High Stakes Limit Hold'em |
|
|
|---|
Pot Limit Omaha |
|
|
|---|
Mixed Games |
|
|
|---|
Tournament Poker |
i find this hand interesting so bump. discussed it with OP off-line and we can't ultimately agree on a river decision.
most crucial reads are that villain's 3bet range is perceived to be tight, especially with fish to act behind, and that Wuffi1 is a drooler that bets if checked to close to 100% of the time.
if villain and OP don't have much history, i don't see why leonidas would want to get that tricky here with a set, especially given stack sizes, and check it thrice. seems unlikely.
we are also at the absolute top of our range, our hand is severely underreped, he is literary repping 6 hands and folding seems exploitable.
Really lost in this hand. Raising the river means the nuts. But we're very strong here.
I think he can have one of the combos that missed. What do you beat he can raise with?
It's history dependant here, I don't think a fold is bad based on stats or history.
fair enough....ill argue for calling
1) our hand is really underepped and i am pretty sure he is not putting us on a set so if he is operating under that assumption - we should be more inclined to call. like i said, i believe we are close to the absolute top of our value range
2) hinging on that assumption and given with the line that we took - our river range should be compromised of mostly one pair type hands that can't stand a shove
3) he never plays something like AK like that so he is certainly not c/ring one pair for value, but if he is capable of checking thrice with kk/jj - i think he can do it with KQ as well
4) who checks the nuts thrice.....if he doesnt have history with OP why does he expect him to bet
Our hand is underrepped - and I would probably call in the heat of the moment - but I really don't see what hands he would turn in a bluff here, and what worse hands would do this for value.
Turning AQ in a bluff? Going for super thin value with KQ (is almost same as AA/AK)? Given the fact that Wuffi1 appeared to bet 100% flops I think the odds of him checking a monster like KK/QQ here trice is a lot higher.
Interesting hand.
I would call on the simple basis that you have trips and your hand is somewhat underrepped he cant possibly expect you to check trips in position on turn (by the way why did you? you cant live your life in fear of an overset).
His check raise on the river would suggest you are in trouble but if he is a thinking player he could be trying an elaborate bluff as he doesnt put you on much or he could be value betting kq (kq does look like its good here given the action)
Having said all that KK or QQ makes sense for him the 3-bet pre flop then he would only call on the flop as he wants to keep the fishy player in. On the turn he checks letting you value cut/bluff yourself and on the river he prob thinks the only way to get more money is to give you another chance to bluff/value but yourself.
All in all ive confused myself whilst writing this - your hand is so big and under repped you have to call however i think he may well have you beat. Still set over set is a cooler and it would be difficult not to go broke here. What did he have?
Our hand is underrepped - and I would probably call in the heat of the moment - but I really don't see what hands he would turn in a bluff here, and what worse hands would do this for value.
Turning AQ in a bluff? Going for super thin value with KQ (is almost same as AA/AK)? Given the fact that Wuffi1 appeared to bet 100% flops I think the odds of him checking a monster like KK/QQ here trice is a lot higher.
I completely agree with all of this.
Do you think it's possible villain is making some reads on your river bet sizing given how the hand has played to that point? I would find it difficult to fold given how we've repped our range.
i call here but i'm not really happy about it...
I think there are both a lot of hands he could turn into a bluff (AQ/TJ type stuff) and a lot of hands he thinks you might fold (AK type stuff) that I would just call it against a good player given how you played the hand.
Also bet turn check river is a way better line than this, if you for some reason don't want to bet/bet/shove, because all his hands are going to have 4+ outs vs you.
that was my thinking xorbie. thing is - there aren't that many players that are willing to turn made hands into bluffs on river this deep, but if he is good, its possible.
afraid that there won't be results for this hand....
i mean would you check a set or a straight on this board? i think it's more likely he's bluff catching/pot controlling w/ two pair, tptk or pair + draw, then thinks your hand can't be a set or a straight and jams w/ something he's either not sure is good enough to call w/ or making a really thin value jam ruling some nut hands out of your range. i'm still happy when i call and lose here.
Home → Poker Forums → High Stakes Strategy → set 3-way 3b pot deep