---

Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by WiltOnTilt (Micro/Small Stakes)

W00t. Wilt is back!

thanks alot for the review Aaron, definitely alot for me to work on here. for some reason my HUD didn't record on camtasia but for anyone that's watching villains stats ended up being... Vpip BB 21, SB 60 / 3B 8 / F3B 70 / CB 80 / FCB 35

Time Link to 00:10:16

WOT do you like going crazy yourself at the start of the match, and seeing what the opponent is made of/how he will react?

Is that different at SSNLHU where villains usually don't stay for very long?

Time Link to 00:41:37

wilt, with the k-10 hand would you ever consider overbetting the river to fold out his weak one pair type stuff and A high that will win at shwodown ?? using the logic that we can credibly have a flush here whereas he so rarely has one after he lets the turn go check check

Time Link to 00:40:15

you say that if he does check/call, we can probably bluff a Q or A. What range would you put him on for check/calling given the information we have?

Time Link to 00:41:06

Table 2 with the KT of clubs, what do you think about leading that board vs check/raising? Doesn't seem like the greatest board for him to cbet, so don't we likely face a range with more air when we lead than when we check/raise and thus have more fold equity? Also, can't he have some hands that might call flop, fold turn or river, like 9x, 88 etc that would have otherwise checked back flop and not folded on later streets.

WOT do you like going crazy yourself at the start of the match, and seeing what the opponent is made of/how he will react?

Is that different at SSNLHU where villains usually don't stay for very long?

I don't necessarily try to do this, but if I think I can run the guy over because he seems to have the mantra "with no reads I fold" then I try to take advantage of it. As you know, I usually have the opposite approach where without reads I call and get reads.

wilt, with the k-10 hand would you ever consider overbetting the river to fold out his weak one pair type stuff and A high that will win at shwodown ?? using the logic that we can credibly have a flush here whereas he so rarely has one after he lets the turn go check check

I think it would be an OK play... I'm not sure about vs this particular opponent though. I can't recall if it's in part 1 or part 2 where he checks a ridiculously strong hand behind on the turn for no apparent reason. In that case, we might be overbetting into a stronger range than we expect.

Vs another tough player though, being able to balance an overbet strategy here with some busted draws, flushes, and hands as weak as TPNK is pretty sexy though.

People are hesitant to call overbets, especially unsophisticated players...so i think it would be especially good in a vacuum at the lower stakes, but perhaps not as ideal at the higher stakes where you can rep more value hands by going for a more depolarized bet size vs thinking players.

you say that if he does check/call, we can probably bluff a Q or A. What range would you put him on for check/calling given the information we have?

Most people would be very hesitant to c/c here with so many "bad" turns with strong hands (even though vs our range, how many bad turns are there really? assuming we're 4betting for value with lots of high card hands) so given that i'd take hands like KT+ out of his range... so mostly hands like QT- would be the strongest he would have for c/c'ing... and maybe some hand like T9, 98s, but I'm not convinced that he has too many of those types of hands in his range preflop anyway...but if he did c/c then I would guess it would be mostly those, since we can discount every flush draw he would be 3bet/calling a 4bet with because it should be overs and fd or straight draw + flush draw here and I'd expect those to just ship as well.

Table 2 with the KT of clubs, what do you think about leading that board vs check/raising? Doesn't seem like the greatest board for him to cbet, so don't we likely face a range with more air when we lead than when we check/raise and thus have more fold equity? Also, can't he have some hands that might call flop, fold turn or river, like 9x, 88 etc that would have otherwise checked back flop and not folded on later streets.

I think leading is certainly viable. It's somewhat tough to balance here and very easy for him to put more draws in your range than you might actually have... so keeping that in mind, you'd want to lead pretty wide for value here and could face some tough decisions to a raise...but certainly I think leading this type of hand should be part of any type of leading strategy, it's just that you have to make sure the other pieces of your range fit well too.

Syzzzurp, solid game, just cut the 4b bluffing vs. guys with 8% 3bet

Time Link to 00:53:34

I'm bit confused as to why you say.villian should be check calling with hand like jj here,i understand we want to give someone a chance to barrel there air,but dont we give ourselves a tough decision when a q,k.or A hit the turn.also aren't we losing value when opponents flops top pair or flush draw here and would call are cr,but maybe check back the turn when we c/c and the flush misses or when a over hits the turn?

thanx wilt makes sense

Syzzzurp, solid game, just cut the 4b bluffing vs. guys with 8% 3bet

haha yh, actually when i was playing a really thought it wasn't gonna be much good for a video so was trying to make some action, can't really remember but i think part 2 has a few good spots, overall i really really found the analysis that Aaron gives of the standard spots super helpful, mainly the bluff spots, but also the 3bet pot where he talks about reg on reg where our opponent reps nothing > 2nd pair+gs type hand, and we should perhaps have a bet chk bet bluff range to consider exploiting opponents floats. If you do decide to bluff on that river Aaron (44.30s) how much are you generally making it into a pot of 19.0$