grebgokz
35 posts
Joined 02/2008
I also liked the format of this video or rather the concept.
Concept of recording the play in advance and afterwards coment on the intresting spots, gives more intresting situations explaned (in some detail) in a shorter time then compared where we comment live while playing (and sometimes dont even get time to take the action planned because timer runs out while explaining the reasoning behind the desicion).
Better video as a base next time and it will be excelent.
Posted almost 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
chomp
145 posts
Joined 03/2008
I liked the format and content a lot. Very practical, realistic advice on those common, "simple" situations that basically decide your winrate. Look forward to the next in the series.
I very much liked the characterisation of a blind battle: "more like a HU match than 6-M". I'd never thought of it in those specific terms, but it's a great macro approach to it.
On the downside, sound was a bit wonky for me too, but no big deal. And it would be good if the tables were identified 1,2,3,4 in commentary.
Posted almost 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
sweetysven
157 posts
Joined 03/2008
I really liked this video, also because you came across situations where I find it difficult to play. I take some notes and learnt a lot! Keep up the good work! Especially finding the good situations with nits behind you and a donk in the blinds, good stuff!
I have some questions, or people can answer them too ofcourse
I see calling in position with hands like JTs/QKs etc, I normally fold them against TAG, because I have always learnt these are reversed implied odds hands, which can cost you lots of money, on flops like K high. Of course, I can fold these kind of hands on the flop when I am suspicious. Is this a big leak? What about low suited connectors?
My next question is can you recommend me something how to improve in reading players, like that play with, minibet flop and turn/push river. I always fold that, because I think he is playing some obvious monster. And the hand in the blind battle with KQ, and c/r all-in by the SB. You just explained me this is e easy call against a TAG, i would come up with these ideas of: I showed strength, raised him made a cbet, how can he think I dont have a good hand. He must have me beat. I try to understand these kind of plays.
Against those TAG regulars at 50NL at FTP, do you suspect those player understand all the aspects you were telling about? For example, calling a raise while he has a LAG next to him, do these player take these things into account? How much credit do you give them, because they (and I) are still playing on microlimits.
Thanks!
Posted almost 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
johnnyson
38 posts
Joined 02/2008
yummyt
1 posts
Joined 01/2008
shark_fishin
224 posts
Joined 03/2008
munkey
13 posts
Joined 03/2008
BoOm
188 posts
Joined 03/2008
ph2133868789
1 posts
Joined 04/2008
30:23 QJs - what do you think of a check here given that donkus has already limped and our hand plays decent multiway? How easily do you think Donkus could call our raise with some crap? then what do you think of our spot?
Also interested in some of what sweetysven said.
Posted almost 4 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
thefist
73 posts
Joined 07/2008
thefist
73 posts
Joined 07/2008
dcvn
1 posts
Joined 07/2008
LoveisHell
17 posts
Joined 11/2008
45Min JJ. I think we should fold here just like you said, because villain is 3betting from the blinds and probably has a strong range. Still I was amazed how you advocated folding when we have an overpair on the flop. I think that is really weak. If we're going to call we're always stacking off here
35.50min TT. I would 3bet here also. Solid advice. As played the flop call is standard, but I would raise the turn since those bets are never a strong hand. I know we're kind of turning our hand into a bluff, but I would raise and try to get him off jacks, QQ, KK. I think your advice to fold is weak.
Teh series has been very good, but I think you have some bad advice on this one.
Posted about 3 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Ejsik
21 posts
Joined 01/2009
I don't understand why you suggest raising so much in a SB vs button limp situation. I mean he had some decent hands like A10o QJs - which you even raise UTG. I agree the raise was a bit small I would raise it to like 2.50 but why 7-8 BB? I mean button limp is such a weak play I think you don't mind playing the pot with quite a decent hand, and you say you want people to FOLD. Isn't that like turning a decent hand into a bluff PF? You might as well do it with 72o.. And don't understand why you would build a big bot because of that raise, I rather think you build big pot when you raise to 7-8 BB and the button calls you..
Posted about 3 years ago
Reply to Topic
Reply w/Quote
Erix5son
325 posts
Joined 02/2010