Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by terp (Micro/Small Stakes)

The hand where you consider your opponent's river AF after 150 hands is an example of how not to look at stats imo. That's a completely useless stat with such a small sample, he probably couldn't have seen river action more than a few times in those hands.

good question

your calculation about when to float includes WHOM to float. consider all the factors listed: texture, opponent's barreling tendencies, opponent's hand reading.

Lets say I would normally raise 99 on 795ss as well as my flush draws, than there would be almost no hands I would call this flop to float with.

When I call my flush draws and sets instead to be able to float as well, how can I profitably play my flush draws without semibluffs?
Is the combination of making the flush and floating profitable enough that we are not just only calling down with a flush draw?

and how do different opponent types affect our decision to do first or second? I would think that the more the player is likely to barrel the turn the more I should raise the flop with strong hands and bluffs. The less likely he is to 2barrel the more likely I should be calling? Is that a good way to think about it?

Lets say I would normally raise 99 on 795ss as well as my flush draws, than there would be almost no hands I would call this flop to float with.

When I call my flush draws and sets instead to be able to float as well, how can I profitably play my flush draws without semibluffs?
Is the combination of making the flush and floating profitable enough that we are not just only calling down with a flush draw?

and how do different opponent types affect our decision to do first or second? I would think that the more the player is likely to barrel the turn the more I should raise the flop with strong hands and bluffs. The less likely he is to 2barrel the more likely I should be calling? Is that a good way to think about it?

well, to start, don't raise 99 here. raise stuff that is absolute trash, good/great draws, and nut hands. call with the marginalish stuff and some mix of the stuff above, keeping the option to turn some of it into bluffs.

call with PPs, 76 type hands and your occasional JT type float. your opponent will be c/f or b/c so many turns you can add some complete/near-complete air into your calling range on this board so as to balance your 99, etc.

the simple fact is - this board hits you, not him. take advantage of that...

Thank you for your reply!
Sorry but maybe I am not getting the point, I have some more questions ;-)

well, to start, don't raise 99 here. raise stuff that is absolute trash, good/great draws, and nut hands.

to me 99 on 795ss is pretty much a nut hand (of course except 68)?
Which other nut hands than sets do you mean? absolute trash and good/great draws is clear...

call with the marginalish stuff and some mix of the stuff above, keeping the option to turn some of it into bluffs.

call with PPs, 76 type hands and your occasional JT type float. your opponent will be c/f or b/c so many turns you can add some complete/near-complete air into your calling range on this board so as to balance your 99, etc.

well, isn't this almost the opposite of what you wrote before, but the same range? So once we are calling with all that range, the other time we are raising the whole range on the flop?

The only difference are the PP which are not sets where it wouldn't make to much sense to raise with, because we get no better hands to fold and no weaker to call which we are doing great against

the simple fact is - this board hits you, not him. take advantage of that...

So we can do this to take advantage of that?

and how do different opponent types affect our decision to do first or second? I would think that the more the player is likely to barrel the turn the more I should raise the flop with strong hands and bluffs. The less likely he is to 2barrel the more likely I should be calling? Is that a good way to think about it?

Thank you in advance for your help!