Poker Video: No Limit Hold'Em by KRANTZ (High Stakes)

1st!!!!!~@!~@!~@~~! ~

same bad quality for the stream and both downloads but not too bad and still watchable.

same bad quality for the stream and both downloads but not too bad and still watchable.

I am getting 1MB/sec on the download and the .mp4 and .wmv just downloaded in <50 seconds.

I am getting 1MB/sec on the download and the .mp4 and .wmv just downloaded in <50 seconds.

But whats up with the quality? :S

I am getting 1MB/sec on the download and the .mp4 and .wmv just downloaded in <50 seconds.

yeah the speed is fine I was talking about the quality

yeah the speed is fine I was talking about the quality

Hrmmmm, you guys are right. Hopefully Rob wakes soon and we can see what we can do.

go wake up Rob, go wake up Rob

Hey krantz. Really nice video as always and some very interesting content. I think jumping through the video and only discuss interesting spots/hands is good, because as you said yourself you have already been talking a lot about general/standard situations and strategy. Even though I really like watching you play nosebleed I really think it would be best for you to make videos at lower stakes like 5/10 and 10/20. The reason being that we would probaly relate better with that kind of stakes. Nosebleed is just another world and most players up there are playing very alternative because they are playing each others all the time and has to be balancing a lot. I don't know if you agree with this and if you don't you've prolly have a good reason

Btw, some more headsup would be great.

-Chris

the skipping between hands is good, although tbh I would rather see you and FWF (hopefully returning soon) playing alot more MSNL games just because you are prob the two best NL instructors, its fun to watch these stakes but its obv not hugely applicable to the majority of mid stakes players

sick stuff, nh

The skipping is fine for recorded videos, but it's also nice to have live-recorded videos where the commentary is occuring while you play. I think it provides additional insight into what's going on in your head while you play. I can understand not doing that for 200/400 games though

I too like this format, and would def like to see the end of this seassion. I think it is great to see you play against players you have tons of history with.

Regarding the KQ hand Larz Luzak played against Urindanger, dont you think that larz bet the flop intending to fire multiple barrels, but changed his mind once that A paired on the turn?

Hrmmmm, you guys are right. Hopefully Rob wakes soon and we can see what we can do.

<yawn>

<sips coffee>

Got my coffee now but unfortunately Jay recorded this one at a lower resolution. Since I know he recorded on his laptop it's my guess that he shrunk the original video to fit his screen when re-recording but shrunk it too far.

There's nothing we can do without recreating the whole video (pauses and all) so I'll check it out and see if that's possible or if it's too complex. It's pretty unlikely there's much I can do for this one though, unfortunately, but I'll let Jay know at the very least so it doesn't happen again.

Rob

Great video. I like the format and also the fact that it is at these stakes because the situations that come up are much more interesting.

When you 4bet small to a pot committing size with 55 against stoner, what's the advantage of 4betting to that size over just 4bet shoving?

Also in the hand where you click it back with K7s on a TT5r flop against that stoner guy, why do you choose to click it back when you plan to bluff the turn anyway? Isn't the whole point in clicking it back to make bluffs cheaper? You might as well reraise bigger, or do you expect him to peel a bigger reraise just about as often as a minreraise?

Btw would you agree that Mace Windu is the most badass Jedi of all?