As SJ & Medic point out and everyone agrees with, you have very little FE live.
Correct me if I am wrong....
I do not use a polarized range live as your range certainly does not need any balance on account of unobservant opponents w zero FE and zero 4 bet range. I want to use the negative end of the polarized range in an environment where I will likely win the pot out right a reasonable amount of the time, achieve a fold OTF when called a reasonable amount of the time (often leveraging position), and benefit from balancing my range making it more difficult to play against me (generate a deseptive range). If the environment will generally require SD value, my opponents do not fold often when they hold a hand of little to moderate value and do not adapt (such as live) then I want to start with valuable hands that SD well and build pots when I have good value. I do not want to inflate the pot with weak hands and lower the SPR. For this reason I use and would suggest a depolorized range of value.
You may find that your opponents have such a tendency to SD with a wide range that your 3 bet value range can become wider, but not polarized. Perhaps this is the statement that you are looking for? Hands that are poor choices to 3 bet with in the online environment like AJ or KQ because of their inability to be called by worse and reverse implied odds may actually become hands that are 3 bet for value in the live environment because of the inverse reasoning for the online environment.
This is the most important advice> Please notes when learning / expanding it is easy to mis apply concepts and advice or suddenly take a concept to the extreme. Please do not do this with this advice and start 3 betting AJ and KQ with a resonance frequency. Examine the situation and have reason for doing it first, strong reason (not "I thought he was weak" that is just the start).
I would tailor my 3 bet strategy to opponents that fold if I ever found them, but they do not exist, they are only a myth in live games lol. Your range should never be preset, but will often hold duplication. AA is always going to be part of my 3 betting range in any environment, but AQ will only be part in very specific environments. The width of my depolorized range is dependent on the enviro.
Live poker, value, value, value.
My story time, good example:
Environment is a regular game I play, 5/10 that goes to SD a very high %.
The villain opened $55 in EP, is know to play a wide range. My read was that her open was smaller then her (and the typical) $65+ and that her motivation was that she would rather set the price on the flop and carry the initiative to the flop rather than pay a high price should somebody else R. A reasonable amount of small PP in this range.
I 3 bet in MP because :
1. I felt she was very likely to play fit or fold post OOP in a 3 bet pot w small PP, and likely to give value with draws with connectors.
2. I wanted to isolate her, my A9o is to weak vs a wide field. Folding is probably better than calling.
3. The button who is very stationy pre appeared uninterested in calling.
4. She is never folding, I will get called by worse.
5. Her bet sizing capped her range, my typically weak A9 was never going to be dominated. I was never going to suffer reversed implied odds.
6. I had position, without it I fold. Ace high will often have SD value and I will be in a position to get there should I feel it beneficial.
As you can see I had many reasons for what I did and this is the important part of the hand.