---

Poker Video: Limit Hold'Em by BigBadBabar (Mid Stakes)

Because there is no value on the river? Even if there is value, I expect the vast majority of players here to still not go for it. I think if villain bets the river with AJ/AQ, he thinks he's bluffing more often than he thinks he's value betting.

Then wouldn't getting those AJ/AQ combos to bet, when they would otherwise fold to a lead all the more reason to c/c?

I guess my question here is what hands do we think the villain will call, that we don't think he'll bet when checked to twice. I'm saying that everything bets here, but not everything calls. I'm guessing that you're saying that everything calls, but doesn't bet frequently enough.

That's more or less it, which explains disagreement on the river action.

That's more or less it, which explains disagreement on the river action.

Slide, I know you have more experience in these situations, at this level. What kinds hands do you expect to see often here checking twice, and calling the river?

Slide, I know you have more experience in these situations, at this level. What kinds hands do you expect to see often here checking twice, and calling the river?

Well he C-bet the flop right? so he only checked back the turn and not the flop as well.

I'd say 33-77, A2, AQ/AJ, sometimes they just call with KJ/KQ too, maybe a hand like Q8. I feel like most opponents are pretty happy to just check down this river card with most of those hands once they check back the turn.

Note: I'm not saying I know for a fact my assumptions to be accurate in this case. I could easily be wrong here.