---

Poker Video: Limit Hold'Em by Joe Tall (High Stakes)

Time Link to 00:07:12

I love villain turn X with K-high. And I think he must pay off sadly. Villains ability to X-back turns should probably go into the pf decission?

Time Link to 00:11:47

What do u think of villains pay-off on the QJ hand? I feel ur hand is pretty face up? U must have a crrrazy image.

Any chance u actually 3-bet this turn with JJ? How often does peopl chck back the flop with qx+? If this is a FSDR enough a 3-bet is obv good.

After I look at this, I have to say I like 3-betting the turn here. Given that:

1. We under-represented our hand.
2. Our opponent checked back the flop.
3. My expert hand reading, LDO.

XR 6h3h seems awesome vs ti guy who prob will be really P on the flop. Would u start donking now when he has X back twice? I uess I have to keeop watching

You are using a language I am unfamiliar with and I think you missed the time stamp by a few seconds.

But I rewound to the the 63s hand on the right, we still dont know much, so he's checked back 2x, I think we still keep him in line until there is a serious trend. Classic: sample size, imo.

I love villain turn X with K-high. And I think he must pay off sadly. Villains ability to X-back turns should probably go into the pf decission?

Yes, agreed. This should factor in the PF and earlier street decisions.

What do u think of villains pay-off on the QJ hand? I feel ur hand is pretty face up? U must have a crrrazy image.

We did have a pretty crazy image but I'm still surprised he paid off w/JJ there.

Time Link to 00:40:51

Given how weirdly this guy plays on big street BF feels kind of dirty. I thin BC s the line I prefer.

You are using a language I am unfamiliar with and I think you missed the time stamp by a few seconds.

Haha that's because I just invented it . P = polarized, we know he checks back his weak SD hands which should improve our ffold equity a ton.

Awesome video, love the format!!!! And thanks Joe for ur comments! U know I'm watching all ur stud videos now. I really like ur style!


@fnupple: Why don't u use the pf 3-bet strategy from the BB I gave (agaisnt ur will) . Yesterday Pygmy revealed he hasn't used PR ones after my private lesson. And now this! No one loves sushi .

Good payoff -- was really expecting to see him be full a lot more than full of shit, but there's no way I can fold there. Definitely worth taking a note that he 3-bet your UTG raise w/JTo then pulled a delayed river raise, maybe trying to take you off KTcc, KJcc?

Rob

They give TPiranha a hard time about his play in this hand but I think he played the hand expertly. The river raise is very good imo considering how many semibluffs fnupple has here. Preflop is slightly bad but its 5 handed.

But I rewound to the the 63s hand on the right, we still dont know much, so he's checked back 2x, I think we still keep him in line until there is a serious trend. Classic: sample size, imo.

I disagree with your conclusion that we don't have a large enough sample to shift strategies. The guy has checked back twice in a short period of time implementing a very non-standard strategy. I think its much more reasonable to conclude he will continue this trend (mathematics of poker discusses Bayesian analysis which is very appropriate here).

This concept occurs very often in huhu LHE, where I think its entirely right to make assumptions about the way a villain plays using a very small sample size, as long as you are continuously willing to adjust the assumptions based on new evidence.

I disagree with your conclusion that we don't have a large enough sample to shift strategies. The guy has checked back twice in a short period of time implementing a very non-standard strategy. I think its much more reasonable to conclude he will continue this trend (mathematics of poker discusses Bayesian analysis which is very appropriate here).

This concept occurs very often in huhu LHE, where I think its entirely right to make assumptions about the way a villain plays using a very small sample size, as long as you are continuously willing to adjust the assumptions based on new evidence.

Of course, but this is not HULHE. But what situation would you donk?

They give TPiranha a hard time about his play in this hand but I think he played the hand expertly. The river raise is very good imo considering how many semibluffs fnupple has here. Preflop is slightly bad but its 5 handed.

You and I talked about this after and I agree, beside preflop, all is good.

Of course, but this is not HULHE. But what situation would you donk?

The point is the same. We have a small sample of hands on a guy taking an unorthodox line in similar situations. I would begin to donk all my value hands on boards he is likely to check behind on in future blind defense spots vs him.

The point is the same. We have a small sample of hands on a guy taking an unorthodox line in similar situations. I would begin to donk all my value hands on boards he is likely to check behind on in future blind defense spots vs him.

I like.