Poker Video: Limit Hold'Em by Joe Tall (High Stakes)

I Has a Pear: Episode Two

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

I Has a Pear: Episode Two by Joe Tall, fnupple

Boston, German, the accents are strong! Joe Tall and fnupple battle it out as fnupple plays $15/30 and $30/60 LHE on 2-tables.

About I Has a Pear Subscribe to

Highish stakes LHE live play videos with duos of DC limit instructors and high limit friends.

Tags

joe tall fnupple i has a pear 2-tabling $15/30 lhe 6max $30/60

Video Details

  • Game: lhe
  • Stakes: High Stakes
  • 49 minutes long
  • Posted almost 4 years ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for I Has a Pear: Episode Two

or track by Email or RSS


forker

Avatar for forker

988 posts
Joined 05/2008

I love this series.
Also your table mod is very sweet.

Posted almost 4 years ago

Sugar Nut

Avatar for Sugar Nut

842 posts
Joined 03/2008

Time Link to 00:35:52

Wow,

limit is such an insane game.

(btw. "I has a pair" literally translated means "Ich hat ein Paar" in german, while "Pear" is "Birne" obv)

The following is a serious question: Why do ppl actually bluff in LHE when everyone and their moms go to showdown with "bottom pear" (Unterbirne ldo)?

I mean I can understand betting the hand I linked just because of the HUGE amounts of equity we have, but from watching limit videos I get the feeling that there is nothing more insane than betting a whiffed draw on the river.

Sure, the pot is so huge more often than not, that the bluff doesn't have to work all that often, but that also means that we're getting called with "trash". That is trash from a NLHE player's POV.

Hmmm... somehow it didn't link the hand. I'm talking about the 54hh at 35 minutes

Posted almost 4 years ago

Entity

Avatar for Entity

8063 posts
Joined 11/2006

Wow,

limit is such an insane game.

(btw. "I has a pair" literally translated means "Ich hat ein Paar" in german, while "Pear" is "Birne" obv)

The following is a serious question: Why do ppl actually bluff in LHE when everyone and their moms go to showdown with "bottom pear" (Unterbirne ldo)?

I mean I can understand betting the hand I linked just because of the HUGE amounts of equity we have, but from watching limit videos I get the feeling that there is nothing more insane than betting a whiffed draw on the river.

Sure, the pot is so huge more often than not, that the bluff doesn't have to work all that often, but that also means that we're getting called with "trash". That is trash from a NLHE player's POV.

Hmmm... somehow it didn't link the hand. I'm talking about the 54hh at 35 minutes


It linked the hand you were talking about. Smile

Basically in spots like that you're targeting the middle and bottom of their range -- it's true that people won't fold pairs or even Ace high, but people will fold QJ and T9s which they'll peel the flop with. Since turn ranges are wider because people peel the flop lightly and call preflop lightly, you have 15 outs very frequently but most importantly you still have a big chance of earning a lot of folds.

Rob

Posted almost 4 years ago

Entity

Avatar for Entity

8063 posts
Joined 11/2006

Entity

Avatar for Entity

8063 posts
Joined 11/2006

Time Link to 00:44:27

Good payoff -- was really expecting to see him be full a lot more than full of shit, but there's no way I can fold there. Definitely worth taking a note that he 3-bet your UTG raise w/JTo then pulled a delayed river raise, maybe trying to take you off KTcc, KJcc?

Rob

Posted almost 4 years ago

Entity

Avatar for Entity

8063 posts
Joined 11/2006

Joe Tall

Avatar for Joe Tall

6688 posts
Joined 11/2006

Games are gooooooooooooooooooood (A8o bluff).



That hand was absolutely sick. From a mis-click to a epic win!

Posted almost 4 years ago

motienko

Avatar for motienko

2112 posts
Joined 03/2008

Time Link to 00:04:01

I don't see the time link here. this is about the 4 minute mark

I think 3 betting this flop is superior to calling. I think we are ahead here quite often. The pot is getting big and I would love to get the button to fold overcards and be heads up and in position against the SB. I also think we can get the button off a ton of one card or even two card gutshot draws which he should have in his range. If he chooses to call it is value.

The Sb shouldn't have too many sixes or sevens in his range. I could see a hand like A5 or 65 both of which you still have a good edge over. He could have a 4 or a one card draw. He probably would have reraised 44,66,77 preflop although I certainly don't have any reads on SB.

Is there a reason that you would prefer calling the flop here?

Posted almost 4 years ago

Entity

Avatar for Entity

8063 posts
Joined 11/2006

I don't see the time link here. this is about the 4 minute mark

I think 3 betting this flop is superior to calling. I think we are ahead here quite often. The pot is getting big and I would love to get the button to fold overcards and be heads up and in position against the SB. I also think we can get the button off a ton of one card or even two card gutshot draws which he should have in his range. If he chooses to call it is value.

The Sb shouldn't have too many sixes or sevens in his range. I could see a hand like A5 or 65 both of which you still have a good edge over. He could have a 4 or a one card draw. He probably would have reraised 44,66,77 preflop although I certainly don't have any reads on SB.

Is there a reason that you would prefer calling the flop here?


I think 3-betting is ok, but it's hard to say because housemom really shouldn't have much in his range there given preflop. If he can have A5 often, he should be able to have 44/66 as well because he's more likely to be passive and too-cally preflop. You definitely want to fold out a hand like KQ when you have the best hand, but when you have the worst hand (up against 87, 76, 64s, or a set), you don't mind stringing him along because his equity gets chopped up between you and the SB.

The more likely SB is to have 98s or T9s, etc., the more apt you should be for jamming, but his coldcall makes it a little harder to narrowly define his range.

If you decided to 3-bet in this spot most of the time I think it's fine, but you should definitely not be 1000% convinced your hand is the nuts here.

Rob

Posted almost 4 years ago

Psychobingo

Avatar for Psychobingo

1358 posts
Joined 03/2008

bluffindeuce

Avatar for bluffindeuce

174 posts
Joined 06/2008

I have a problem with the mp4 version. One of the colour layers seems shifted in both VLC and WMP. The wmv looks perfect. Has anyone else this problem?

Posted almost 4 years ago

Entity

Avatar for Entity

8063 posts
Joined 11/2006

I have a problem with the mp4 version. One of the colour layers seems shifted in both VLC and WMP. The wmv looks perfect. Has anyone else this problem?


Sounds like a codec issue on your computer, wish I could provide more but that's pretty hard to diagnose.

Rob

Posted almost 4 years ago

sushiglutton

Avatar for sushiglutton

2747 posts
Joined 11/2007

Time Link to 00:01:46

Any chance u actually 3-bet this turn with JJ? How often does peopl chck back the flop with qx+? If this is a FSDR enough a 3-bet is obv good.

Posted almost 4 years ago

sushiglutton

Avatar for sushiglutton

2747 posts
Joined 11/2007

Time Link to 00:06:28

XR 6h3h seems awesome vs ti guy who prob will be really P on the flop. Would u start donking now when he has X back twice? I uess I have to keeop watching Smile

Posted almost 4 years ago




HomePoker ForumsMid/High Stakes Limit Hold'em → I Has a Pear : Episode Two