Poker Video: Limit Hold'Em by DosXX (High Stakes)

DC Shorts: DosXX (#2) - LHE Hands Part 1

This video is a two minute preview. To view the entire video, please Log In or Sign Up Now
Get the Flash Player to see this player.
 

DC Shorts: DosXX (#2) - LHE Hands Part 1 by DosXX

DosXX talks over a few high-stakes LHE hands.

About DC Shorts Subscribe to

DC shorts are short content bursts brought to you by DC Labs. Roughly 1/4 the length of standard videos, these shorts are designed to review single hands, concepts or ideas. You'll receive the most up to date content available and stay in touch with the latest and greatest here at DC and the poker community at large.  The more you post in the forums the more likely it is your post will be the inspiration for a future DC short!

Tags

high stakes lhe hand replayer ipod friendly hh review dosxx dc shorts

Video Details

  • Game: lhe
  • Stakes: High Stakes
  • 13 minutes long
  • Posted about 1 year ago

Downloads

Premium Subscribers can download high-quality, DRM-free videos in multiple formats.

Sign Up Today


Comments for DC Shorts: DosXX (#2) - LHE Hands Part 1

or track by Email or RSS


Busting you

Avatar for Busting you

572 posts
Joined 12/2007

Busting you

Avatar for Busting you

572 posts
Joined 12/2007

sublime

Avatar for sublime

79 posts
Joined 02/2007

Dos,

I love these formats, I never make it through a full video in one sitting and probably don't soak up as much info as I would if most/all videos were like this.

Anyway, how much weight do you assign to the villains overall ability? It looks like you want about ~30% hot and cold equity to continue vs a regular opponent, but how high or low will you go when your opponents deviate in the good/bad direction?

Posted about 1 year ago

DosXX

Avatar for DosXX

384 posts
Joined 01/2008

Dos,

I love these formats, I never make it through a full video in one sitting and probably don't soak up as much info as I would if most/all videos were like this.

Anyway, how much weight do you assign to the villains overall ability? It looks like you want about ~30% hot and cold equity to continue vs a regular opponent, but how high or low will you go when your opponents deviate in the good/bad direction?



I assign some weight, though it's more accurate to say that I tweak my ranges based on the type of postflop player I am dealing with. If they are passive not that showdown bound, I can successfully play more hands in position and plan to bluff more often. If they are a good/solid player, I would lop off some of the worst hands from my range, but don't go too crazy, maybe bottom 5-10% or so. If they are a very poor player in general, I would probably expand my range to any two cards, since we are going to be making a lot of money postflop against them.

Posted about 1 year ago

BigBadBabar

Avatar for BigBadBabar

4432 posts
Joined 03/2007

Nice video, and a cool topic to talk about. I certainly would have been folding too much before having seen this. What do you think about the related situation where we post a big blind in the CO (say we are new to the game), there's an EP raise, and it folds to us? Let's say at 40/80 for example. Guy makes it 80, and there's 20 + 40 out in the blinds already, plus our 40. now we're getting 4.5 to 1 assuming I did the math correctly - should we be calling any two? Against good players should we be calling blind for meta? Smile

The small blind on the button thing has always confused me btw

Posted about 1 year ago

DosXX

Avatar for DosXX

384 posts
Joined 01/2008

Nice video, and a cool topic to talk about. I certainly would have been folding too much before having seen this. What do you think about the related situation where we post a big blind in the CO (say we are new to the game), there's an EP raise, and it folds to us? Let's say at 40/80 for example. Guy makes it 80, and there's 20 + 40 out in the blinds already, plus our 40. now we're getting 4.5 to 1 assuming I did the math correctly - should we be calling any two? Against good players should we be calling blind for meta? Smile

The small blind on the button thing has always confused me btw



I think the fact that we only need something like 22% equity to continue vs the face that we have one more player to act behind us probably evens out the results such that they become very similar to the situation I described in the video. Meaning, the tension between getting better odds but having poorer position probably balances to mean we should be playing a similar amount of hands (80-85%). I only fold some hands now because there is more of a chance of a 3bet/4bet situation and we also don't have the absolute best position at the table.

Posted about 1 year ago

grandmofftarkin

Avatar for grandmofftarkin

493 posts
Joined 04/2011

...The small blind on the button thing has always confused me btw


How it works for our casino is when the player who should be the button gets up, the sb now is the button and there are two big blinds. Only reason for this remedy I can think of is that if this isn't done, one player (the person now in the CO) would get an extra hand as the button and possibly someone gets to skip a blind.

Posted about 1 year ago

RedHot

Avatar for RedHot

684 posts
Joined 07/2009

My connection isn't good enough today to quote from the timeline, but a couple of points:

From villain's perspective, I wonder about bet/folding over-pairs on the river, giving the opportunity to bet/3bet bigger flushes.

Its obviously player dependent, and it seems to me this guy probably isn't great given his bet/call/lose on the river on that board - are these guys really raising the likes of KTo from early position in this spot? I have played very little live but when I did I found they didn't adjust to situations so well and probably wouldn't open so wide here.

Posted about 1 year ago

Amaryllis

Avatar for Amaryllis

429 posts
Joined 09/2007

Loved it. You covered pretty much all angles. Thx.

You mentioned you wouldn't necessarily 3bet all of your suited connectors to keep your ranges balanced. What if your opponents are not very observant most of the time? I always feel range balancing in live is over rated, at least in my games. Opponents don't have databases of your previous hands to analyse either. How much weight do you give to balancing your range live, and at what levels would you start to take it seriously?

Posted 12 months ago

iplaylimit

Avatar for iplaylimit

2426 posts
Joined 04/2007

Since the blinds are live, you need to include them when running preflop hot-cold equity. For example, 76o goes down to less than 19% once you include random hands from SB/BB.

Agree and like the discussion on villain's river action.

Posted 12 months ago

motienko

Avatar for motienko

2112 posts
Joined 03/2008

I don't typically see tight players in this position raising KTo or ATo. I don't play these. I usually muck KJo as well, am I playing too tight. This is at 8-16 and 20-40. Does playing at the higher stakes make a difference in your range. Obviously the rake is higher at the lower stakes.

Posted about 1 month ago




HomePoker ForumsMid/High Stakes Limit Hold'em → DC Shorts : DosXX (#2) - LHE Hands Part 1