August 12, 2012

Modern Pentathlon and other stories

NB: skip to end for poker content.

Yesterday my girlfriend and I headed down to Greenwich Park to check out the last 3 events from the men's Modern Pentathlon. I knew next to nothing about it before going (studied up on what the events were but that's about it). For those not in the know, first of all everyone has a fencing bout vs everyone else (not all at the same time unfortunately), then there's a 200m swim. My tickets didn't cover either of those events.

The event following that is show-jumping. I've never been a big fan of this on the telly but it was pretty exciting, to be honest. Something that adds to that excitement in the pentathlon is that for the 36 contestants there are 18 horses and which athlete gets which horse is down to a draw that happens an hour before the event. This led to a lot of horses and riders clearly not getting on with each other. A few horses tried to throw their rider, one succeeded and it got pretty close to being very nasty; looked like horse had fallen on rider but turned out to be fine. The horse was caught and the rider ran after it, got on and completed the course, all while the clock was running!

Based on scores after these rounds there's a combined run and shoot (with laser pistols, I kid you not - imagine my excitement when I saw that in the programme!). It's a bit like the biathlon with less snow. After a tough race the winner was David Svoboda of the Czech Rep. Well done to him. The home team got 10th and 13th so sadly no more medals added to the frankly awesome tally GB have got so far.

When did we get good at this sort of thing? Used to be we were rubbish at the Olympics and decent at football. Now our footballers are pretty embarrassing on and off the pitch and it's this stuff we're good at. What happened?

Right onto the poker. I've moved totally over to HU, got myself a coach and plan on working hard to get good at the game. I spent a couple of weeks going through a ton of DC and CR HU content to get a feel for how preflop and postflop ranges differ from 6max, had my first coaching session last week and have played a bit.

So far I much prefer it to 6max. It's more like an argument or chess game than I experienced playing against 5 other people, even folding preflop doesn't feel like "oh I'm not playing this hand", but rather it's part of a strategy for manipulating this opponent. No doubt that's highlighting my weakness at 6max rather than anything else. I probably should have been thinking that way but for some reason never felt in the game enough to do that. When it's one on one there's no escaping it, you ARE part of the game ALL the time.

Posted By Deets at 11:08 AM

12 Comments

12 Comments:

shuttle posted on August 12, 2012 at 13:26 PM

Juliaslice_1k

How do you get action at HU?


Deets posted on August 12, 2012 at 13:36 PM

Dcav

You won't like the answer... I play the lowest stakes available.


shuttle posted on August 13, 2012 at 11:10 AM

Juliaslice_1k

What do the lowest stakes available happen to be?


Deets posted on August 13, 2012 at 18:45 PM

Dcav

I found some 2nl can you believe!


shuttle posted on August 13, 2012 at 19:35 PM

Juliaslice_1k

Just make sure it's beatable (I"m going to guess it isn't if the buyin is $2)


Deets posted on August 13, 2012 at 19:43 PM

Dcav

Very small sample so far but pretty sure it's beatable. The rake isn't too bad (just under 7% albeit never reaching the cap) and players aren't good.

I'm just doing it to learn and to get back into the habit of playing a lot, so not too worried about winning money at this level. I just want to get to grips with it without worrying about money.


shuttle posted on August 13, 2012 at 20:56 PM

Juliaslice_1k

Rake in bb/100 is what matters. I've seen some sites 2nl rake be 100bb/100 so I think the beat-ability of the games depends a lot on where you play.


Deets posted on August 13, 2012 at 23:05 PM

Dcav

Ah interesting. So far I've paid rake at 28bb/100. What would you estimate is a maximum bb/100 for a decent skill advantage to show a profit long-term?


shuttle posted on August 15, 2012 at 07:58 AM

Juliaslice_1k

I think it's hard to say. A lot hinges on game selection at the brutal rake stakes as unfortunately playing anyone even remotely reggish at those stakes means instant lose for both players. But yeah 28bb/100 is insanely high rake and I'd be somewhat surprised if it's beatable, I mean in 200 hands a whole buyin drops off the table if you are playing 100bb deep.


Deets posted on August 15, 2012 at 19:05 PM

Dcav

This is a bit of an eye-opener for me. I've always looked at rake as a % of a won pot rather than as an average loss per 100 hands.

Unfortunately, the next lowest stake I can find is 20nl, I'd like to have 100bi so don't have the roll. Guess I'll get plenty of practice in at these stakes and just boost my roll incrementally from outside earnings.


shuttle posted on August 16, 2012 at 11:06 AM

Juliaslice_1k

What site are you playing at?


Deets posted on August 16, 2012 at 21:46 PM

Dcav

William Hill. I've since found some 10nl at PKR so might speed things up a bit by jumping to there at some point.


 

Log in or to leave a comment!

About Me

Dcav

Deets