May 18, 2011
Pro's Thoughts: Cons of the Poker Lifestyle
Op-Ed here on my website.
Additional thoughts on the article:
I don't aspire to be the best. Is that wrong-way thinking?
I don't aspire to be the next Tom "Durrrr" Dwan or Phil Ivey.
I don't have pipe dreams of winning the World Series of Poker Main Event.
I don't want to "grind" for the rest of my life.
But I DO love the game. But I don't think playing 8+ hours a day is fun (most the time). That's a fucking grind.
The problem with poker is, like David Peat mentions in the above article, you can never really get a sense of accomplishment from it. So even post Black Friday, poker consumes a ton of my time (just got started on Merge) essentially preventing me from moving on to other things.
Part of this is choice and self-control, true.
But think of a video game, you feel the compulsive need to play until you beat it. How often do you play that game after you beat it? Not often, right? I know playing games doesn't reward you $$$ (I wish, right?!) but you get the point.
For me, I've decided my criteria for "beating the game" months ago, I just wanted to accomplish one thing from this list:
- Ship a Sunday Major
- Ship a Online Major (FTOP/SCOOP, etc.)
- Ship a WPT/WSOP event.
Yes, unfortunately, 2 out of the 3 tasks on that list will be put on hold (US Player). But if I could do just one, my career for me is "accomplished".Â
That doesn't mean I'll quit the game, I love it way too much. It just means I won't have to grind the rest of my life searching for the sense of accomplishment.
I want to be "semi-retired", the part-time pro. Ahh yes, that's the life I want.Â
Thoughts? What's your guys' criteria for beating the game?
